Pro & Con #8: Is the Supreme Court Right to See Money as Speech?

In this hypothetical example, Andy
McFearless, an incumbent Republican, is running for president in the 2020
presidential election. McFearless was getting big money from supporters. The
supporters were giving him large sums of money greater than $25,000 dollars. Due
to these big checks from big donors, McFearless won the election by a
landslide. However, Mandy SkyRaider, the frontrunner of the Democratic Party,
is also running for president in the 2020 presidential election. SkyRaider does
not have supporters giving her large sums of money greater than $25,000
dollars. SkyRaider feels like the election is rigged because she doesn’t have
the same supporters as her competitor, McFearless, does. Due to theses big
checks from big donors to McFearless and hardly any support for SkyRaider,
McFearless won the election by a landslide.
This fictional example poses the question, “Is the Supreme Court right to see money as speech because limiting money will provide…
View original post 1,087 more words
Recent Posts
See AllEvery day, we encounter economic choices or, in essence, trade-offs. Trade-offs are defined as trading something in exchange for...
Mindy McKinley, an economics professor at Wichita State University, defines economics as "The science of scarcity; the science of how...
The Democrats are blaming Biden's late exit that contributed to 2024 Presidential Candidate Harris astounding defeat to Former President...
Comments